Previous Page  20 / 140 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

18 HANS J. RØSJORDE

building trends in the 1970s and 1980s was characterised with the installation of only

electric heating. What are those living in such houses supposed to do in winter if

there is electric power outage and outside temperatures of -30

o

C?

Society meets new challenges and increased risks as a consequence of ongoing

intensified urbanisation, be it fire, floods or man-made risks associated with

criminality or terrorism. This demands new types of risk analysis, plans for public

security and safety, mitigation and response plans for potential crises, and robust

local communities.

The role of local councils

The system of local borough councils in Norway provides the foundation for national

planning and preparedness in matters of public safety. This should ensure that local

communities are safe and robustly protected against natural hazards. By law, the

councils are obliged to map and prepare for potential unwanted and unforeseen

events and evaluate the risk levels they represent. As required by the Civil Protection

Act, such preparedness needs to be summarised in a “Risk and Vulnerability

Analysis” (“ROS-analyse” in Norwegian).

A survey performed in 2014 displays a positive progression in such analyses

compared to a similar investigation in 2012. Most councils are working

systematically on natural hazards and public safety. However, there is still some

work needed, as some councils have not yet fulfilled the requirements defined in the

Civil Protection Act. Every council, irrespective of size, must identify their risks and

plan accordingly. One problem in Norway is that many of the smaller councils

administer sparsely populated areas, and yet with a high potential for natural hazards.

In this context, the County Governor has a particularly important role, not

least as the supervisor of council activities. I would emphasise the importance of

building and development plans. We know that homes, houses and larger buildings

in many parts of the country are already built on unsafe ground, in locations that

hardly would be considered as building sites today. We have seen several recent

examples where better planning could have prevented or at least minimised mishaps

and disasters. In particular, I am thinking of landslides, mud-flows, rockfalls and

floods, e.g. those in Bergen and Namsos.

Another challenge is that Norway has many road and railway tunnels and

bridges built through or on problematic ground. We recently experienced the

disastrous collapse of a bridge pillar involving a large, relatively new, major bridge

construction on one of the busiest highways in southern Norway. This accident

fortunately caused no loss of human life, but resulted in very substantial repair costs.

There is an urgent need for continued research into soil and rock stability and their

consequences for major construction work to avoid accidents and disasters. Several

research groups and organisations are focusing on such aspects. This topic will be

addressed in more detail in this book.

The Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection is required to maintain a

complete overview of risks and safety issues in Norway and to present an annual